Stop Overthinking Career Decisions - Use this Test
You know the question.
Does this decision make you stronger in 12 months or just more comfortable today?
Great test. How will you execute it?
Most people ask it once, get a vague feeling about the answer, then ignore it and choose comfort anyway. Or they ask it in their head, confuse themselves with justifications, and end up paralysed.
The test only works if you actually use it properly.
Here's how.
The Four-Step Framework
Step 1: Write down what each path actually builds
Don't think about this. Write it down. Thinking lets you rationalise. Writing forces honesty.
Take whatever decision you're facing. Create two columns: Path A and Path B.
Under each, write what you'll actually have in 12 months. Not what you hope might happen. What capabilities, relationships, and experience you'll definitely build regardless of outcome.
Example: You're choosing between a promotion to senior manager or moving to a smaller company as a director. (Click to Expand)
Path A (Senior Manager):
- Larger team management experience
- Navigate established corporate processes
- Deepen existing stakeholder relationships
- Master skills I already have foundation in
Path B (Director at smaller company):
- Full P&L ownership for first time
- Build processes from scratch
- Broader strategic exposure
- Learn to operate with less support
Notice what's happening here. You're not listing pros and cons. You're naming what you'll develop. The answer often becomes obvious when you're this specific.
Step 2: Identify the disguise
Comfort disguises itself as strategic thinking. You need to catch it.
Look at what you wrote. Now ask yourself:
Which justifications are really just fear dressed up as wisdom?
Common disguises:
- 'I should build deeper expertise first' = I'm avoiding being average at something new
- 'The timing isn't quite right' = I'm waiting for growth that doesn't require discomfort
- 'I need more information' = I'm delaying a decision I already know the answer to
- 'I should be realistic about my constraints' = I'm optimising for safety and calling it pragmatism
This step is uncomfortable. That's the point. You're looking for the story you're telling yourself about why comfort is actually the smart choice.
Write down the justification. Then write what it actually means. Be brutal.
Step 3: Check the pattern
One comfortable choice is fine. A pattern of comfortable choices is leading to a stalled career.
Look back at your last 3-5 significant decisions. What did you choose? Be honest.
If you've chosen stronger multiple times recently, you've probably earned some consolidation. Choose comfort consciously and recover.
If you've chosen comfort repeatedly, you've identified your problem. The pattern is the issue, not the individual decision.
This context matters. The test is not about any single choice. It's about the trajectory your choices create over time.
Step 4: Make the choice and name the trade-off
You still have to decide. The framework doesn't decide for you. It just makes you honest about what you're deciding.
Sometimes you choose comfort. That's legitimate. Maybe you're managing real constraints. Maybe you need stability right now. Maybe you're recovering from a growth period.
Fine. Just name it: "I'm choosing comfort because [real reason]."
Sometimes you choose stronger. That means accepting discomfort, risk, and potential failure. Name that too: "I'm choosing growth knowing it means [specific discomfort]."
Either way, you own it. No self-deception about what you're optimizing for.
When the test gets sloppy
Both options feel comfortable
You're not asking a big enough question. You're choosing between two versions of safety.
Go back. What decision would actually stretch you? That's probably the one you're avoiding thinking about.
Both options feel like growth
Rare but real.
When this happens, you've created genuine optionality. Choose based on which capability compounds better with what you already have or which aligns with where you want to be in five years.
External trade-offs override the test
Sometimes they do. Family situations. Health issues. Financial realities. Real constraints exist.
The test still helps. It tells you the cost of the constraint. 'I'm choosing comfort because I need stability while caring for my parent' is different from 'I'm choosing comfort because change is scary.'
One is strategic. The other is avoidance. Know which you're doing.
Real Scenarios, Real Choices
Scenario 1: You're offered a lateral move to lead a struggling team. Your current team is performing well and makes you look good.
(Click to Expand)
Stronger: Take the struggling team. Learn to turn around performance. Build credibility across a harder challenge.
Comfortable: Stay where success is easier. Protect your track record. Avoid the risk of visible failure.
The test: What makes you more valuable in 12 months, proven turnaround experience or an extended winning streak doing work you've already mastered?
Scenario 2: You can specialise deeper in your technical area or move into a role with broader business exposure.
(Click to Expand)
Stronger: Depends on your gap. If you're already technical, business exposure probably stretches you more. If you've avoided depth, specialisation might be your growth edge.
Comfortable: Whichever feels more familiar based on your background.
The test: What capability are you actually missing that limits your next move?
Your Implementation Plan
Please don't do this for every decision. You'll overthink yourself into paralysis.
Use the framework for decisions that actually matter. Role changes. Project selection. Skill development priorities. Strategic relationships.
For your next significant decision:
- Open a document
- Write Path A and Path B with what each builds in 12 months
- Identify any disguised comfort in your reasoning
- Check your pattern over recent decisions
- Make the choice and name the trade-off out loud
The test works when you use it honestly, not when you use it to justify what you already want to do.
Most career stagnation is not about wrong decisions. It's about consistently choosing comfort while telling yourself you're being strategic.
This framework stops the self-deception. That's what makes it brutal. That's also what makes it work.
Member discussion